Section / 04
Sectors
SecondMark applies one disciplined assurance logic across domains while adapting the evidence model to each system's authority, environment, and consequences.
07Detailed briefs
Detailed positions for decisions that require more than a checklist.
Each brief defines the assurance question, the evidence that matters, the intended outcome, and the professional boundary on any conclusion.
Frontier AI systems
Assurance for model-centered systems whose capabilities, interfaces, and operational authority change faster than conventional governance cycles.
Financial infrastructure
Independent assurance for software that moves value, records entitlement, allocates risk, or controls access to financial authority.
Healthcare software systems
Assurance for software whose output informs care, operations, access, or safety-relevant decisions.
Industrial autonomy
Assurance for software that observes, plans, or acts within physical processes and operational environments.
Critical infrastructure software
System assurance for software supporting essential services, control planes, coordination, or operational continuity.
Enterprise AI platforms
Assurance for organization-wide platforms that coordinate models, data, tools, identity, automation, and business authority.
Public-interest systems
Independent assurance for software used in decisions that materially affect access, rights, services, allocation, or public trust.
Common evidence base
Four evidence planes. One independent conclusion.
Authority and consequence mapping
Human and automated control points
Failure containment and recovery evidence
Begin an engagement
Bring us the system that cannot be reduced to a standard audit.
We will begin with the decision, the claims, and the system boundary.
Start a confidential conversation ↗